linux-kernel - Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51EE3BFA.5000403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:46:58 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Kiko Piris <kernel@...ispons.net>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2

On 07/23/2013 02:22 AM, Kiko Piris wrote:
> On 22/07/2013 at 21:29 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> 
>> Try applying the two mainline commits that I mentioned in my previous
>> mail, on top of 3.10.2 and check if it fixes your problem.
> 
> It does fix it.
> 
> Running 3.10.2 with your two patches, suspended and resumed a couple of
> times without a problem (previously it didn’t wake up 100% of the
> times).
> 
> Thank you both for your help!
> 

Thank you for your testing efforts and for confirming that the
patches fix your issue.

 
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/