[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374610772.2072.22.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:19:32 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
<linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
"Linux Kernel Development" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net 2/2] sfc: Reduce RX scatter buffer size, and
reduce alignment if appropriate
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 23:01 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> This still doesn't fix the s390 build because like most architectures
> it has NET_IP_ALIGN == 2. When NET_IP_ALIGN != 0 we cannot achieve
> cache line alignment at either the start or end of a scatter buffer,
> so there is actually no point in padding the buffers to a multiple of
> the cache line size. All we need is 4-byte alignment of the network
> header, so do that.
[...]
I was just thinking about this again. Do we need to care about
alignment in a page fragment at all? Won't all the headers be pulled
into the header area before being accessed with any instructions that
would require alignment? (We aren't using build_skb().)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists