[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51EDEA9C.7070709@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:29:48 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
CC: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
<ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] KS Topic request: Handling the Stable
kernel, let's dump the cc: stable tag
On 2013/7/23 5:24, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> I review what I can, but recently have often missed the 2 day review
>> period.
>>
>> Review from the authors and maintainers is probably more valuable than
>> that from generalists on the stable list.
>
>>>From point of subsystem developers view, the problem is there are too many
> stable branches. I can't memorize what is different each other.
> Currently www.kernel.org
> lists two stable and five longterm branches. Who know all of them?
> Eventually I only
> checked them when I have enough much spare time.
I only check those maintained by Greg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists