[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHGf_=okjbBrFkmpXJrkQ1BZkta-7sYVEyuaDp4Mk8eQU=ijOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:24:12 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] KS Topic request: Handling the Stable
kernel, let's dump the cc: stable tag
> I review what I can, but recently have often missed the 2 day review
> period.
>
> Review from the authors and maintainers is probably more valuable than
> that from generalists on the stable list.
>From point of subsystem developers view, the problem is there are too many
stable branches. I can't memorize what is different each other.
Currently www.kernel.org
lists two stable and five longterm branches. Who know all of them?
Eventually I only
checked them when I have enough much spare time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists