linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1374647210-ac6q11s5-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jul 2013 02:26:50 -0400
From:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle
 hugepage

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:10:07PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
...
> >diff --git v3.11-rc1.orig/mm/page_isolation.c v3.11-rc1/mm/page_isolation.c
> >index 383bdbb..cf48ef6 100644
> >--- v3.11-rc1.orig/mm/page_isolation.c
> >+++ v3.11-rc1/mm/page_isolation.c
> >@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #include <linux/page-isolation.h>
> > #include <linux/pageblock-flags.h>
> > #include <linux/memory.h>
> >+#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> > #include "internal.h"
> >
> > int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages)
> >@@ -252,6 +253,10 @@ struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private,
> > {
> > 	gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE;
> >
> >+	if (PageHuge(page))
> >+		return alloc_huge_page_node(page_hstate(compound_head(page)),
> >+					    numa_node_id());
> >+
> 
> Why specify current node? Maybe current node is under remove.

Yes. One difficulty is that this function doesn't have vma and we can't
rely on mempolicy for node choice. I think that simply choosing the next
node by incrementing node id can be a work around, though it's not the
best solution.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/