[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1374674565.482089959@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:02:45 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Will Deacon" <will.deacon@....com>,
"Russell King" <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
"Jed Davis" <jld@...illa.com>
Subject: [34/85] ARM: 7765/1: perf: Record the user-mode PC in the call chain.
3.2.49-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jed Davis <jld@...illa.com>
commit c5f927a6f62196226915f12194c9d0df4e2210d7 upstream.
With this change, we no longer lose the innermost entry in the user-mode
part of the call chain. See also the x86 port, which includes the ip.
It's possible to partially work around this problem by post-processing
the data to use the PERF_SAMPLE_IP value, but this works only if the CPU
wasn't in the kernel when the sample was taken.
Signed-off-by: Jed Davis <jld@...illa.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -795,6 +795,7 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchai
struct frame_tail __user *tail;
+ perf_callchain_store(entry, regs->ARM_pc);
tail = (struct frame_tail __user *)regs->ARM_fp - 1;
while ((entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) &&
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists