[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1374674565.134867544@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:02:45 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Sunil Mushran" <sunil.mushran@...il.com>,
"Joel Becker" <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mark Fasheh" <mfasheh@...e.com>, "Jie Liu" <jeff.liu@...cle.com>,
"Junxiao Bi" <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
Subject: [66/85] ocfs2: xattr: fix inlined xattr reflink
3.2.49-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
commit ef962df057aaafd714f5c22ba3de1be459571fdf upstream.
Inlined xattr shared free space of inode block with inlined data or data
extent record, so the size of the later two should be adjusted when
inlined xattr is enabled. See ocfs2_xattr_ibody_init(). But this isn't
done well when reflink. For inode with inlined data, its max inlined
data size is adjusted in ocfs2_duplicate_inline_data(), no problem. But
for inode with data extent record, its record count isn't adjusted. Fix
it, or data extent record and inlined xattr may overwrite each other,
then cause data corruption or xattr failure.
One panic caused by this bug in our test environment is the following:
kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:1435!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Pid: 10871, comm: multi_reflink_t Not tainted 2.6.39-300.17.1.el5uek #1
RIP: ocfs2_xa_offset_pointer+0x17/0x20 [ocfs2]
RSP: e02b:ffff88007a587948 EFLAGS: 00010283
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000010 RCX: 00000000000051e4
RDX: ffff880057092060 RSI: 0000000000000f80 RDI: ffff88007a587a68
RBP: ffff88007a587948 R08: 00000000000062f4 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000010
R13: ffff88007a587a68 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88007a587c68
FS: 00007fccff7f06e0(0000) GS:ffff88007fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00000000015cf000 CR3: 000000007aa76000 CR4: 0000000000000660
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process multi_reflink_t
Call Trace:
ocfs2_xa_reuse_entry+0x60/0x280 [ocfs2]
ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry+0x17e/0x2a0 [ocfs2]
ocfs2_xa_set+0xcc/0x250 [ocfs2]
ocfs2_xattr_ibody_set+0x98/0x230 [ocfs2]
__ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x4f/0x700 [ocfs2]
ocfs2_xattr_set+0x6c6/0x890 [ocfs2]
ocfs2_xattr_user_set+0x46/0x50 [ocfs2]
generic_setxattr+0x70/0x90
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x80/0x1a0
vfs_setxattr+0xa9/0xb0
setxattr+0xc3/0x120
sys_fsetxattr+0xa8/0xd0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
Cc: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -6499,6 +6499,16 @@ static int ocfs2_reflink_xattr_inline(st
}
new_oi = OCFS2_I(args->new_inode);
+ /*
+ * Adjust extent record count to reserve space for extended attribute.
+ * Inline data count had been adjusted in ocfs2_duplicate_inline_data().
+ */
+ if (!(new_oi->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) &&
+ !(ocfs2_inode_is_fast_symlink(args->new_inode))) {
+ struct ocfs2_extent_list *el = &new_di->id2.i_list;
+ le16_add_cpu(&el->l_count, -(inline_size /
+ sizeof(struct ocfs2_extent_rec)));
+ }
spin_lock(&new_oi->ip_lock);
new_oi->ip_dyn_features |= OCFS2_HAS_XATTR_FL | OCFS2_INLINE_XATTR_FL;
new_di->i_dyn_features = cpu_to_le16(new_oi->ip_dyn_features);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists