[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130725064802.GA12569@nautica>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:48:02 +0200
From: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@....fr>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: pebolle@...cali.nl, lucho@...kov.net, ericvh@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andi@...zian.org, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
rminnich@...dia.gov
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] net: trans_rdma: remove unused
function
Hard morning, sorry for the double mail.
Dominique Martinet wrote on Thu, Jul 25, 2013 :
> Well, I do care - but I couldn't find where the trans->cancelled member
> function was supposed to be called anyway...
> So adding it to the struct and fixing the warning is well and fine, but
> if it's still never called in the end I don't see much point and there's
> nothing to test.
To be more precise, there's a single call to c->trans_mode->cancelled in
net/9p/client.c, in p9_client_flush, which is called on subfunction returning
-ERESTARTSYS... which never happens as far as I could see.
This will be useful once/if we start working on client recovery, though
- so the function in itself definitely does interest me, and I guess
that thinking about I would have preferred to have the hook added rather
than the function removed.
But there definitely is no hurry to add this cancelled function till
then.
Regards,
--
Dominique Martinet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists