[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130725082741.GB4295@jack.whiskey>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:27:41 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>
To: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@....fr>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, pebolle@...cali.nl,
lucho@...kov.net, ericvh@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...zian.org,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, rminnich@...dia.gov
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] net: trans_rdma: remove unused function
Hi,
> To be more precise, there's a single call to c->trans_mode->cancelled in
> net/9p/client.c, in p9_client_flush, which is called on subfunction returning
> -ERESTARTSYS... which never happens as far as I could see.
>
> This will be useful once/if we start working on client recovery, though
> - so the function in itself definitely does interest me, and I guess
> that thinking about I would have preferred to have the hook added rather
> than the function removed.
> But there definitely is no hurry to add this cancelled function till
> then.
I would prefer to NACK my patch, it messes up things more than
fixes.
If we really want to get rid of this function we should
completely revert this patch:
80b45261a0b263536b043c5ccfc4ba4fc27c2acc
otherwise, spread in the code, there will be empty references to
the 'cancelled' function (struct p9_trans_module in transport.h
and the one you mentioned).
I would rather prefer Paul's approach to mine, let's just get rid
of the warning :)
Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists