[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpoktwZUvs2ap7wk1tudVsiKjbhFkoM5=+AaFZP=+73fEyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:44:29 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>, durgadoss.r@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] cpufreq: Store cpufreq policies in a list
On 25 July 2013 22:03, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote:
> Policies available in a cpufreq framework are now linked together. They are
> accessible via cpufreq_policy_list defined at cpufreq core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Looks good but would have been better if you could have moved
existing code to use this infrastructure..
For example, this code in __cpufreq_add_dev()
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
/* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has siblings */
read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
for_each_online_cpu(sibling) {
---
}
read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists