linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Add Dialog DA9063 core driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130729155727.GA11830@zurbaran>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:57:27 +0200
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Krystian Garbaciak <krystian.garbaciak@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Add Dialog DA9063 core driver.

Hi Lee,

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 04:46:14PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Krystian Garbaciak <krystian.garbaciak@...semi.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig                  |   12 +
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/Makefile                 |    3 +
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c            |  177 ++++++
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c             |  197 ++++++
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c             |  193 ++++++
> > > > >  include/linux/mfd/da9063/core.h      |  110 ++++
> > > > >  include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h     |  114 ++++
> > > > >  include/linux/mfd/da9063/registers.h | 1090 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  8 files changed, 1896 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > Whoah!! Who's going to want to review a 2k line patch?
> > 
> > Well, most of those lines consist of the register and bit(field)
> > definitions and the assignment of those to regmap and regmap-irq.
> > 
> > I could split this into (core+i2c) and (irq) parts if you insist.
> 
> I won't insist on it, 
I would. Smaller patches are easier to review, track and bisect.
So if you can logically split this patch into smaller pieces,, then
please do so.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/