linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given in usb_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51F7752B.8050804@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:41:23 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	<balbi@...com>
CC:	<tony@...mide.com>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<eballetbo@...il.com>, <javier@...hile0.org>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given
 in usb_bind_phy

On Tuesday 30 July 2013 12:46 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:16:20PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>>> the list of controller device (names) it can support (PHY framework does not
>>>>>> maintain a separate list for binding like how we had in USB PHY library). e.g.
>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg92817.html. In such
>>>>>
>>>>> this has nothing to do with $subject though. We talk about generic PHY
>>>>> framework once all these PHY drivers are moved there :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>> cases how do we pass the device names. Also will the MUSB core device be
>>>>>> created before twl4030-usb PHY device?
>>>>>
>>>>> and why would that be a problem ? We're telling the framework that the
>>>>> musb device will use a phy with a name of 'twl4030'. If musb calls
>>>>> usb_get_phy_dev() and doesn't find a phy, it'll return -EPROBE_DEFER and
>>>>> try again later.
>>>>
>>>> I think we are talking about different problems here ;-) I'm trying to tell
>>>> using idr in MUSB core is needed for Generic PHY Framework. So in a way, the
>>>> Generic PHY Framework series depends on this patch series or else MUSB in OMAP3
>>>> platforms wont work after Generic PHY framework gets merged.
>>>
>>> then you just found a limitation in your framework, right ? :-) I mean,
>>> imagine if now we have to add an IDR to every single user of your
>>> framework because they could end up in systems with multiple instances
>>> of the same IP ?
>>
>> I raised a similar concern in the PHY framework discussion [1] :-) And since
>> it's used everywhere else regulators, clkdev, etc.. it's agreed to be used in
>> PHY as well. Btw if PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO is used even regulator, clk_get should
>> fail IMO.
>>
>> [1] -> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1307.2/03573.html
> 
> look at Greg's and my reply to that email.

but finally Greg agreed to what Tomasz proposed no?

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/