lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F775B5.201@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:13:41 +0200
From:	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] mutex: fix deadlock injection

The check needs to be for > 1, because ctx->acquired is already incremented.
This will prevent ww_mutex_lock_slow from returning -EDEADLK and not locking
the mutex. It caused a lot of false gpu lockups on radeon with
CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH=y because a function that shouldn't be able
to return -EDEADLK did.

Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
index ff05f4b..a52ee7bb 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
 	might_sleep();
 	ret =  __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
 				   0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx);
-	if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 0)
+	if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 1)
 		return ww_mutex_deadlock_injection(lock, ctx);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
 	ret = __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
 				  0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx);
 
-	if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 0)
+	if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 1)
 		return ww_mutex_deadlock_injection(lock, ctx);
 
 	return ret;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ