linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] phy: phy-amxxxx-usb: Add PHY driver for amxxxx platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:33:39 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>
CC:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <balbi@...com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] phy: phy-amxxxx-usb: Add PHY driver for amxxxx
 platform

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:54:55PM +0530, George Cherian wrote:
> On 7/30/2013 2:23 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >On 07/30/2013 07:19 AM, George Cherian wrote:
> >>>So from what I see now, it is most likely the easiest thing to just add
> >>>that wakeup to the phy driver I posted. Do you agree?
> >>The whole idea of writing a seperate phy driver was to use the generic
> >>phy framework
> >>and most of the amxxxx devices have the same phy (eg am335x, am437x).
> >>Now since the register is shared in am335x for phy_wkup (Not in the case
> >>of am437x)
> >>how are you planning to  map it. I feel if omap_control_usb can delegate
> >>the writes
> >>to phy_wkup, phy_on and phy_off, it makes the life simpler.
> >that omap-control driver looks a little strange. It has a compatible
> >field saying ti,omap-control-usb and then it requires additionally a
> >ti,type property which should have been avoided.
> 
> ti,type property is to differentiate between usb2 and usb3 phy for a
> single soc.
> for eg: OMAP5 has both usb2 and usb3 phy

let's try not to add any new TI-specific DT bindings, can you figure
that out by reading some revision register ? Or perhaps by using
different compatible strings ?

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)