[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F7D2A9.7030803@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:50:17 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] perf: add ability to sample physical data addresses
On 7/30/13 8:21 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> One thing that bothers me with the MMAP2 approach is that
> it forces integration into perf. Now, you will need to analyze
> the MMAP2 records. With my sample_type approach, you
> simply needed a cmdline option on perf record, and then
> you could dump the sample using perf report -D and feed
what do you want that is not coming out via perf-script?
> them into a post-processing script. But now, the analysis
> needs to be integrated into perf or the tool needs to parse
> the full perf.data file.
you mean parsed during perf-record?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists