[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1375197449-32370-1-git-send-email-richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:17:29 +0200
From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH resend] MTD: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous
We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correting
capability is chosen.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>
---
It seems that this patch has been forgotten (even by me)
for some months. (was already acked by Josh then)
Reference of the discussion leading to this patch:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/46342
drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
index 2d23d29..2415cdc 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
return err_no;
}
- if (cap != host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
+ if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size)
dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n");
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists