linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH resend] MTD: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1375455107.14869.326.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:51:47 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] MTD: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not
 dangerous

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 17:17 +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
> We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correting
> capability is chosen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>

Pushed to l2-mtd.git, thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/