[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1375276989.624585746@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:23:09 +0200
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Joe Jin" <joe.jin@...cle.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [07/84] neighbour: fix a race in neigh_destroy()
3.2.50-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit c9ab4d85de222f3390c67aedc9c18a50e767531e ]
There is a race in neighbour code, because neigh_destroy() uses
skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue) without holding neighbour lock,
while other parts of the code assume neighbour rwlock is what
protects arp_queue
Convert all skb_queue_purge() calls to the __skb_queue_purge() variant
Use __skb_queue_head_init() instead of skb_queue_head_init()
to make clear we do not use arp_queue.lock
And hold neigh->lock in neigh_destroy() to close the race.
Reported-by: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/core/neighbour.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 5b9709f..0ea3fd3 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static void neigh_flush_dev(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct net_device *dev)
we must kill timers etc. and move
it to safe state.
*/
- skb_queue_purge(&n->arp_queue);
+ __skb_queue_purge(&n->arp_queue);
n->output = neigh_blackhole;
if (n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)
n->nud_state = NUD_NOARP;
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static struct neighbour *neigh_alloc(struct neigh_table *tbl)
if (!n)
goto out_entries;
- skb_queue_head_init(&n->arp_queue);
+ __skb_queue_head_init(&n->arp_queue);
rwlock_init(&n->lock);
seqlock_init(&n->ha_lock);
n->updated = n->used = now;
@@ -701,7 +701,9 @@ void neigh_destroy(struct neighbour *neigh)
if (neigh_del_timer(neigh))
printk(KERN_WARNING "Impossible event.\n");
- skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
+ write_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
+ __skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
+ write_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
dev_put(neigh->dev);
neigh_parms_put(neigh->parms);
@@ -843,7 +845,7 @@ static void neigh_invalidate(struct neighbour *neigh)
neigh->ops->error_report(neigh, skb);
write_lock(&neigh->lock);
}
- skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
+ __skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
}
static void neigh_probe(struct neighbour *neigh)
@@ -1176,7 +1178,7 @@ int neigh_update(struct neighbour *neigh, const u8 *lladdr, u8 new,
write_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
}
- skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
+ __skb_queue_purge(&neigh->arp_queue);
}
out:
if (update_isrouter) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists