[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130731132708.GQ9858@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:27:08 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] chipidea: Use devm_request_irq()
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:55:27AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> If you have DMA / IRQ / command engine deactivations in devm path
> which often is the case with full conversions, freeing any resources
> including DMA areas and host private data in the wrong order is a
> horrible idea. It's worse as it won't really be noticeable in most
> cases.
It's really only interrupts that affect most devices - if there's DMA or
anything going on after the remove() then as you said earlier the driver
is probably doing something wrong.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists