[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130731135751.GT9858@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:57:51 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] chipidea: Use devm_request_irq()
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:42:15AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:27:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It's really only interrupts that affect most devices - if there's DMA or
> > anything going on after the remove() then as you said earlier the driver
> > is probably doing something wrong.
> Hmmm... it depends on the specific driver is converted but if the
> deactivation sequence - shutting down of command engine - is also
> handled by devm as in libata and if you have non-devres resource free
> in the exit path, you have the same problem. Again, in general,
That's the only API I've ever heard of doing that. Everything else is
just using it to do deallocation.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists