linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION/PATCH] acpi: blacklist win8 OSI for ASUS Zenbok Prime UX31A

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130731140010.GA24560@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:00:10 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION/PATCH] acpi: blacklist win8 OSI for ASUS Zenbok
 Prime UX31A

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:32:47AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> > There's no mechanism for an OS to know whether or not a firmware
> > implementation will actually turn the backlight off at 0, so there's no
> > way the OS can define the lowest backlight state as anything other than
> > "May or may not turn the screen off".
> 
> Yes there is; quirks.

We aren't going to maintain a quirk list in order to support a guarantee 
that was never made. "0" as a backlight level has potentially meant 
"screen off" since the interface was first introduced.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/