[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130731154355.GD4880@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 21:13:55 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Theurer <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Improve numa scheduling by consolidating tasks
* Andrew Theurer <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2013-07-31 08:33:44]:
> ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
> VM-node00| 49153(006%) 673792(083%) 51712(006%) 36352(004%)
>
> I think the consolidation is a nice concept, but it needs a much tighter
> integration with numa balancing. The action to clump tasks on same node's
> runqueues should be triggered by detecting that they also access
> the same memory.
>
Thanks Andrew for testing and reporting your results and analysis.
Will try to focus on getting consolidation + tighter integration with
numa balancing.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists