lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130731173513.GA12770@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:05:13 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Improve numa scheduling by consolidating tasks

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2013-07-30 11:33:21]:

> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:45:43PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> 
> > Can you please suggest workloads that I could try which might showcase
> > why you hate pure process based approach?
> 
> 2 processes, 1 sysvshm segment. I know there's multi-process MPI
> libraries out there.
> 
> Something like: perf bench numa mem -p 2 -G 4096 -0 -z --no-data_rand_walk -Z
> 

The above dumped core; Looks like -T is a must with -G.

I tried "perf bench numa mem -p 2 -T 32 -G 4096 -0 -z --no-data_rand_walk -Z"
It still didn't seem to do anything on my 4 node box (almost 2 hours
and nothing happened).

Finally I ran "perf bench numa mem -a"
(both with ht disabled and enabled)

Convergence wise my patchset did really well.

bw looks like a mixed bag. Though there are improvements, we see
degradations. I am not sure how to quantify which was the best among the
three. nx1 tests were the ones where this patchset had a -ve; but +ve
for all others.

Is this what you were looking for? Or was it something else?

(Lower is better)
testcase		3.9.0		Mels v5		this_patchset 	Units
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1x3-convergence		0.320		100.060		100.204		secs
1x4-convergence		100.139		100.162		100.155		secs
1x6-convergence		100.455		100.179		1.078		secs
2x3-convergence		100.261		100.339		9.743		secs
3x3-convergence		100.213		100.168		10.073		secs
4x4-convergence		100.307		100.201		19.686		secs
4x4-convergence-NOTHP	100.229		100.221		3.189		secs
4x6-convergence		101.441		100.632		6.204		secs
4x8-convergence		100.680		100.588		5.275		secs
8x4-convergence		100.335		100.365		34.069		secs
8x4-convergence-NOTHP	100.331		100.412		100.478		secs
3x1-convergence		1.227		1.536		0.576		secs
4x1-convergence		1.224		1.063		1.390		secs
8x1-convergence		1.713		2.437		1.704		secs
16x1-convergence	2.750		2.677		1.856		secs
32x1-convergence	1.985		1.795		1.391		secs


(Higher is better)
testcase		3.9.0		Mels v5		this_patchset 	Units
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RAM-bw-local		3.341		3.340		3.325		GB/sec
RAM-bw-local-NOTHP	3.308		3.307		3.290		GB/sec
RAM-bw-remote		1.815		1.815		1.815		GB/sec
RAM-bw-local-2x		6.410		6.413		6.412		GB/sec
RAM-bw-remote-2x	3.020		3.041		3.027		GB/sec
RAM-bw-cross		4.397		3.425		4.374		GB/sec
2x1-bw-process		3.481		3.442		3.492		GB/sec
3x1-bw-process		5.423		7.547		5.445		GB/sec
4x1-bw-process		5.108		11.009		5.118		GB/sec
8x1-bw-process		8.929		10.935		8.825		GB/sec
8x1-bw-process-NOTHP	12.754		11.442		22.889		GB/sec
16x1-bw-process		12.886		12.685		13.546		GB/sec
4x1-bw-thread		19.147		17.964		9.622		GB/sec
8x1-bw-thread		26.342		30.171		14.679		GB/sec
16x1-bw-thread		41.527		36.363		40.070		GB/sec
32x1-bw-thread		45.005		40.950		49.846		GB/sec
2x3-bw-thread		9.493		14.444		8.145		GB/sec
4x4-bw-thread		18.309		16.382		45.384		GB/sec
4x6-bw-thread		14.524		18.502		17.058		GB/sec
4x8-bw-thread		13.315		16.852		33.693		GB/sec
4x8-bw-thread-NOTHP	12.273		12.226		24.887		GB/sec
3x3-bw-thread		17.614		11.960		16.119		GB/sec
5x5-bw-thread		13.415		17.585		24.251		GB/sec
2x16-bw-thread		11.718		11.174		17.971		GB/sec
1x32-bw-thread		11.360		10.902		14.330		GB/sec
numa02-bw		48.999		44.173		54.795		GB/sec
numa02-bw-NOTHP		47.655		42.600		53.445		GB/sec
numa01-bw-thread	36.983		39.692		45.254		GB/sec
numa01-bw-thread-NOTHP	38.486		35.208		44.118		GB/sec



With HT ON

(Lower is better)
testcase		3.9.0		Mels v5		this_patchset 	Units
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1x3-convergence		100.114		100.138		100.084		secs
1x4-convergence		0.468		100.227		100.153		secs
1x6-convergence		100.278		100.400		100.197		secs
2x3-convergence		100.186		1.833		13.132		secs
3x3-convergence		100.302		100.457		2.087		secs
4x4-convergence		100.237		100.178		2.466		secs
4x4-convergence-NOTHP	100.148		100.251		2.985		secs
4x6-convergence		100.931		3.632		9.184		secs
4x8-convergence		100.398		100.456		4.801		secs
8x4-convergence		100.649		100.458		4.179		secs
8x4-convergence-NOTHP	100.391		100.428		9.758		secs
3x1-convergence		1.472		1.501		0.727		secs
4x1-convergence		1.478		1.489		1.408		secs
8x1-convergence		2.380		2.385		2.432		secs
16x1-convergence	3.260		3.399		2.219		secs
32x1-convergence	2.622		2.067		1.951		secs



(Higher is better)
testcase		3.9.0		Mels v5		this_patchset 	Units
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RAM-bw-local		3.333		3.342		3.345		GB/sec
RAM-bw-local-NOTHP	3.305		3.306		3.307		GB/sec
RAM-bw-remote		1.814		1.814		1.816		GB/sec
RAM-bw-local-2x		7.896		6.400		6.538		GB/sec
RAM-bw-remote-2x	2.982		3.038		3.034		GB/sec
RAM-bw-cross		4.313		3.427		4.372		GB/sec
2x1-bw-process		3.473		4.708		3.784		GB/sec
3x1-bw-process		5.397		4.983		5.399		GB/sec
4x1-bw-process		5.040		8.775		5.098		GB/sec
8x1-bw-process		8.989		6.862		13.745		GB/sec
8x1-bw-process-NOTHP	8.457		19.094		8.118		GB/sec
16x1-bw-process		13.482		23.067		15.138		GB/sec
4x1-bw-thread		14.904		18.258		9.713		GB/sec
8x1-bw-thread		24.160		29.153		12.495		GB/sec
16x1-bw-thread		41.283		36.642		32.140		GB/sec
32x1-bw-thread		46.983		43.068		48.153		GB/sec
2x3-bw-thread		9.718		15.344		10.846		GB/sec
4x4-bw-thread		12.602		15.758		13.148		GB/sec
4x6-bw-thread		13.807		11.278		18.540		GB/sec
4x8-bw-thread		13.316		11.677		22.795		GB/sec
4x8-bw-thread-NOTHP	12.548		21.797		30.807		GB/sec
3x3-bw-thread		13.500		18.758		18.569		GB/sec
5x5-bw-thread		14.575		14.199		36.521		GB/sec
2x16-bw-thread		11.345		11.434		19.569		GB/sec
1x32-bw-thread		14.123		10.586		14.587		GB/sec
numa02-bw		50.963		44.092		53.419		GB/sec
numa02-bw-NOTHP		50.553		42.724		51.106		GB/sec
numa01-bw-thread	33.724		33.050		37.801		GB/sec
numa01-bw-thread-NOTHP	39.064		35.139		43.314		GB/sec


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ