[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1307312001450.4893@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 20:03:46 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>, <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 7/8] swiotlb-xen: support autotranslate guests
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Support autotranslate guests in swiotlb-xen by keeping track of the
> phys-to-bus and bus-to-phys mappings of the swiotlb buffer
> (xen_io_tlb_start-xen_io_tlb_end).
>
> Use a simple direct access on a pre-allocated array for phys-to-bus
> queries. Use a red-black tree for bus-to-phys queries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> CC: david.vrabel@...rix.com
> ---
> drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> index 353f013..c79ac88 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> @@ -38,32 +38,116 @@
> #include <linux/bootmem.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
> +#include <linux/rbtree.h>
> #include <xen/swiotlb-xen.h>
> #include <xen/page.h>
> #include <xen/xen-ops.h>
> #include <xen/hvc-console.h>
> +#include <xen/features.h>
> /*
> * Used to do a quick range check in swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single and
> * swiotlb_tbl_sync_single_*, to see if the memory was in fact allocated by this
> * API.
> */
>
> +#define NR_DMA_SEGS ((xen_io_tlb_nslabs + IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - 1) / IO_TLB_SEGSIZE)
> static char *xen_io_tlb_start, *xen_io_tlb_end;
> static unsigned long xen_io_tlb_nslabs;
> /*
> * Quick lookup value of the bus address of the IOTLB.
> */
>
> -static u64 start_dma_addr;
> +struct xen_dma{
> + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> + phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> + size_t size;
> + struct rb_node rbnode;
> +};
> +
> +static struct xen_dma *xen_dma_seg;
> +static struct rb_root bus_to_phys = RB_ROOT;
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xen_dma_lock);
> +
> +static void xen_dma_insert(struct xen_dma *entry)
> +{
> + struct rb_node **link = &bus_to_phys.rb_node;
> + struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
> + struct xen_dma *e;
> +
> + spin_lock(&xen_dma_lock);
> +
> + while (*link) {
> + parent = *link;
> + e = rb_entry(parent, struct xen_dma, rbnode);
> +
> + WARN_ON(entry->dma_addr == e->dma_addr);
> +
> + if (entry->dma_addr < e->dma_addr)
> + link = &(*link)->rb_left;
> + else
> + link = &(*link)->rb_right;
> + }
> + rb_link_node(&entry->rbnode, parent, link);
> + rb_insert_color(&entry->rbnode, &bus_to_phys);
> +
> + spin_unlock(&xen_dma_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static struct xen_dma *xen_dma_retrieve(dma_addr_t dma_addr)
> +{
> + struct rb_node *n = bus_to_phys.rb_node;
> + struct xen_dma *e;
> +
> + spin_lock(&xen_dma_lock);
> +
> + while (n) {
> + e = rb_entry(n, struct xen_dma, rbnode);
> + if (e->dma_addr <= dma_addr && e->dma_addr + e->size > dma_addr) {
> + spin_unlock(&xen_dma_lock);
> + return e;
> + }
> + if (dma_addr < e->dma_addr)
> + n = n->rb_left;
> + else
> + n = n->rb_right;
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock(&xen_dma_lock);
> + return NULL;
> +}
>
> static dma_addr_t xen_phys_to_bus(phys_addr_t paddr)
> {
> - return phys_to_machine(XPADDR(paddr)).maddr;
> + int nr_seg;
> + unsigned long offset;
> + char* vaddr;
> +
> + if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> + return phys_to_machine(XPADDR(paddr)).maddr;
> +
> + vaddr = (char *) phys_to_virt(paddr);
> + if (vaddr >= xen_io_tlb_end || vaddr < xen_io_tlb_start)
> + return ~0;
> +
> + offset = vaddr - xen_io_tlb_start;
> + nr_seg = offset / (IO_TLB_SEGSIZE << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> +
> + return xen_dma_seg[nr_seg].dma_addr + (paddr & ((IO_TLB_SEGSIZE << IO_TLB_SHIFT) - 1));
I have just realized that there is a much better way of doing this:
return xen_dma_seg[nr_seg].dma_addr + (paddr - xen_dma_seg[nr_seg].phys_addr);
> }
>
> static phys_addr_t xen_bus_to_phys(dma_addr_t baddr)
> {
> - return machine_to_phys(XMADDR(baddr)).paddr;
> + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> + {
> + struct xen_dma *dma = xen_dma_retrieve(baddr);
> + if (dma == NULL)
> + return ~0;
> + else
> + return dma->phys_addr + (baddr & ((IO_TLB_SEGSIZE << IO_TLB_SHIFT) - 1));
same here:
return dma->phys_addr + (baddr - dma->dma_addr);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists