linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] perf: Sanitize get_callchain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130801134931.GD431@somewhere>
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:49:36 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] perf: Sanitize get_callchain_buffer()

On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:32:17PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:28:34PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> > > also for following case:
> > > 
> > >         count = atomic_inc_return(&nr_callchain_events);
> > >         if (WARN_ON_ONCE(count < 1)) {
> > >                 err = -EINVAL;
> > >                 goto exit;
> > >         }
> > > 
> > > seems like it screws the count
> > 
> > I'm not sure what you mean here. You mean that it could be negative when the dec is done
> > outside the lock?
> 
> yes
> 

I don't understand why.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/