linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB: ohci-at91: add usb_clk for transition to common clk framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
cc:	boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: ohci-at91: add usb_clk for transition to common
 clk framework

On Thu, 1 Aug 2013, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> > Yes.  However, a more elegant approach is to protect the relevant
> > statements with: if (defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)).  This preprocessor
> 
>     You probably meant IS_ENABLED() or IS_BUIILTIN()? Or is there something I 
> don't know about gcc preprocessor?

Yes, sorry, I meant IS_ENABLED().  Boris got it right.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/