linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: at91/dt: make use of periph id macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51FB7BB6.1010606@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:28:22 +0200
From:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To:	boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
CC:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: at91/dt: make use of periph id macros

On 02/08/2013 11:04, boris brezillon wrote:
> Hello Richard,
> 
> On 01/08/2013 09:37, Richard Genoud wrote:
>> 2013/8/1 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This patch series move at91 SoCs peripheral id definitions from machine
>>> specific include dir to dt-bindings include dir.
>>> These macros are used to reference interrupts instead of peripheral
>>> numbers.
>>>
>>> This makes dt definitions cleaner and easier to debug (one can easily
>>> tell if
>>> the peripheral macro used to reference an interrupt line is not the
>>> good one).
>>>
>>> These macros will be used for clk definitions and references too.
>>>
>>> I am not sure 'include/dt-bindings/at91/xxx' is the best place to put
>>> these
>>> definitions as there are no soc specific directories in dt-bindings
>>> include
>>> dir right now. Maybe something like
>>> 'include/dt-bindings/soc/at91/xxx' or
>>> 'include/dt-bindings/peripherals/at91/xxx' would be better.
>>> What do you think ?
>> Well, I'd rather use "atmel" than "at91" because, AFAIK, this prefix
>> has been dropped for new atmel SoCs (sama5 for instance).
> 
> Should I do the same for at91 clk series (replace drivers/clk/at91
> directory
> by drivers/clk/atmel and include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h by
> include/linux/clk/atmel_pmc.h) ?
I would say so, but like you said, that needs atmel maintainer's feedback !

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/