[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130802104930.GB1718@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 03:49:30 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging/lustre: lloop depends on BLOCK
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:57:22PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> It provides significant performance improvement for network IO on Lustre.
> It bypasses DLM locking in Lustre and the VFS layer on the client, copying
> in the loop driver, and page-by-page IO submission in the normal IO path.
Part of being upstream is improving existing drivers instead of copy and
pasting them. Please take a Look at Shaggys in-kernel direct I/O and
loop improvements and submit any incremental improvements ontop of that
one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists