[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8761vo2o28.fsf@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:57:03 +0100
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, gaoyang.zyh@...bao.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: stable: a59f4e079d19464eebb9b06513a1d4f55fdae5ba needs backport ?
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> writes:
> * Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> commit a59f4e079d19464eebb9b06513a1d4f55fdae5ba
>> Author: Zhu Yanhai <gaoyang.zyh@...bao.com>
>> Date: Tue Jan 8 12:56:52 2013 +0800
>>
>> sched: Fix the broken sched_rr_get_interval()
>>
>> Without this patch, syscall sched_rr_get_interval() can return wrong
>> value, and the bug was introduced in 2.6.24, so this looks like a
>> candidate for stable kernel.
>>
>> The concern for backporting is that this might break some userspace
>> programs? As the changelog says:
>>
>> [ Since this is an ABI and an old bug, we'll test this via a
>> slow upstream route, to hopefully discover any app breakage. ]
>
> It appears to have caused no trouble.
>
> So I'm fine with backporting it to older -stable kernels:
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Thanks, I'm queuing it for the 3.5 kernel.
Cheers,
--
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists