| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:08:47 +0800 From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, <gaoyang.zyh@...bao.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: stable: a59f4e079d19464eebb9b06513a1d4f55fdae5ba needs backport ? Hi Greg, Could you queue this commit for 3.0 and 3.4? It has been acked by Ingo. On 2013/8/2 19:14, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com> wrote: > >> commit a59f4e079d19464eebb9b06513a1d4f55fdae5ba >> Author: Zhu Yanhai <gaoyang.zyh@...bao.com> >> Date: Tue Jan 8 12:56:52 2013 +0800 >> >> sched: Fix the broken sched_rr_get_interval() >> >> Without this patch, syscall sched_rr_get_interval() can return wrong >> value, and the bug was introduced in 2.6.24, so this looks like a >> candidate for stable kernel. >> >> The concern for backporting is that this might break some userspace >> programs? As the changelog says: >> >> [ Since this is an ABI and an old bug, we'll test this via a >> slow upstream route, to hopefully discover any app breakage. ] > > It appears to have caused no trouble. > > So I'm fine with backporting it to older -stable kernels: > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> > > Thanks, > > Ingo > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists