| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51FBCF05.9090509@calxeda.com> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:23:49 -0500 From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>, "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>, "swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>, "ian.campbell@...rix.com" <ian.campbell@...rix.com>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] sata, highbank: fix ordering of SGPIO signals On 07/29/2013 11:55 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:11:54AM -0500, Mark Langsdorf wrote: >> The ACTIVITY and ERROR signals were reversed in the original commit. >> Fix that. > > And what's the implication of this change? Does this change the > behavior of the driver? If so, how? If not, why not? *Please* be > more descriptive in patch descriptions and explain *why* the changes > are being made. I didn't think I needed more of an explanation than "this is completely wrong per the spec" but I'll revise and resubmit. --Mark Langsdorf Calxeda, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists