[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51FBCF21.3050807@calxeda.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:24:17 -0500
From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"ian.campbell@...rix.com" <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sata, highbank: set tx_atten override bits
On 07/30/2013 11:42 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:38:24PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 07/26/2013 11:22 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:11:57PM +0100, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
>>>> Some board designs do not drive the SATA transmit lines within the
>>>> specification. The ECME can provide override settings, on a per board
>>>> basis, to bring the transmit lines within spec. Read those settings
>>>> from the DTB and program them in.
>>>
>>> How variable is the use of this property going to be? Would it instead
>>> be possible to decide that this was necessary, and choose the
>>> appropriate values based on a compatible property?
>>
>> It is based on compliance testing of the particular board design. Basing
>> on a compatible property would not work in this case.
>
> Ok. Could you clarify the u8/cell usage in the binding and amend the
> example please?
Yes, I'll do that. Thanks for the review.
--Mark Langsdorf
Calxeda, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists