[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130805171142.GA6978@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:11:42 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.11-rc4
On 08/05, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. It should not crash under strace... please see below.
> >
> >> 953 ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, 1035, 0, 0) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
> >
> > OK, so it actually uses ptrace ;)
> >
> > PTRACE_ATTACH fails because this child is already traced by strace, I guess.
> >
> > So does Starcraft crash this way? Or does it fail in some other way?
>
> It's crashing just the same.
But then it is not clear how fab840f can make any difference.
wine can not use ptrace when it runs after "strace -f". But, to remind,
I know nothing about wine. Perhaps wine uses some daemons which actually
run/ptrace the workload?
> > And just in case... perhaps wine does some logging too?
>
> Yeah, but there doesn't seem to be anything interesting:
>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=45489
at least there is certainly nothing interesting for me since
I don't understand this ;) Thanks.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists