linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5200AF41.7090405@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:09:37 +0200
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates

On 08/05/2013 06:25 PM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 02/08/13 13:12, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/02/2013 11:55 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>> On 02/08/13 10:48, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> On 08/02/2013 11:32 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22/07/13 12:21, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>>>>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch series adds support to configure the rate and enable the event
>>>>>> stream for architected timer. Since the timer control register is reset to
>>>>>> zero on warm boot, CPU PM notifier is added to re-initialse it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> This series is required to support TC2 cpuidle.
>>>>> It will be good if you can review and get this in for v3.12
>>>>
>>>> So do you want me to take the series through my tree ?
>>>>
>>> Yes I believe it has to go through your(ARM specific clocksource?) tree,
>>> but currently there's a conflict with another bug fix(that should come
>>> from rmk as -rc fix)
>>> (Commit ab8d46c0 "ARM: 7788/1: elf: fix lpae hwcap feature reporting in
>>> proc/cpuinfo" in rmk -fixes)
>>
>> IMO, you should rebase this patch on top of tips/core, I will apply the
>> series and when the rmk fix hits this branch (through tips/urgent), that
>> will be up to the maintainer to resolve this conflict.
>>
> 
> The fix with which this series was conflicting is already in v3.11-rc4
> So can I send pull request based on v3.11-rc4 or if you prefer any
> particular tree, can you provide details please ?

Ok, I will ping Thomas to update the tips/core branch to 3.11-rc4.



-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/