linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5200BB7D.3020501@arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:01:49 +0100
From:	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC:	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates

On 06/08/13 09:09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/05/2013 06:25 PM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On 02/08/13 13:12, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 08/02/2013 11:55 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>>> On 02/08/13 10:48, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>> On 08/02/2013 11:32 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22/07/13 12:21, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch series adds support to configure the rate and enable the event
>>>>>>> stream for architected timer. Since the timer control register is reset to
>>>>>>> zero on warm boot, CPU PM notifier is added to re-initialse it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This series is required to support TC2 cpuidle.
>>>>>> It will be good if you can review and get this in for v3.12
>>>>>
>>>>> So do you want me to take the series through my tree ?
>>>>>
>>>> Yes I believe it has to go through your(ARM specific clocksource?) tree,
>>>> but currently there's a conflict with another bug fix(that should come
>>>> from rmk as -rc fix)
>>>> (Commit ab8d46c0 "ARM: 7788/1: elf: fix lpae hwcap feature reporting in
>>>> proc/cpuinfo" in rmk -fixes)
>>>
>>> IMO, you should rebase this patch on top of tips/core, I will apply the
>>> series and when the rmk fix hits this branch (through tips/urgent), that
>>> will be up to the maintainer to resolve this conflict.
>>>
>>
>> The fix with which this series was conflicting is already in v3.11-rc4
>> So can I send pull request based on v3.11-rc4 or if you prefer any
>> particular tree, can you provide details please ?
> 
> Ok, I will ping Thomas to update the tips/core branch to 3.11-rc4.
> 
Thanks Daniel, will send pull request once it's updated.

Regards
Sudeep


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/