[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52014A2C.5080705@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:40:36 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>
CC: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
chegu_vinod@...com, drjones@...hat.com, ouyang@...pitt.edu,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, avi.kivity@...il.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
lf-virt <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 3/5] kvm : Fold pv_unhalt flag into GET_MP_STATE ioctl
to aid migration
On 08/07/2013 12:02 AM, Eric Northup wrote:
>
> If this is about migration correctness, could it get folded into the
> previous patch 2/5, so that there's not a broken commit which could
> hurt bisection?
Yes. It could be. Only reason I maintained like that was,
original author in the previous patch is different (Srivatsa) and I did
not want to merge this hunk when the patch series got evolved to mix
the sign-offs.
Gleb, Paolo please let me know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists