linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/16] x86, asmlinkage: Make all interrupt handlers asmlinkage / _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <520165AD.704@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:07:57 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] x86, asmlinkage: Make all interrupt handlers asmlinkage
 / __visible

On 08/05/2013 03:02 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> These handlers are all referenced from assembler stubs, so need
> to be visible.
> 
> The handlers without arguments become asmlinkage, the others __visible
> to not force regparms(0) on x86-32.
> 
> I put it all into a single patch, please let me know if you want
> it it split up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

I'm getting massive conflicts on this patch, so I do need to understand
better what is your baseline, and yes, it probably would be useful to
split it up.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/