linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] clock: correct the comparison parameter of MHz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130807080253.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:02:53 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clock: correct the comparison parameter of MHz

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 03:47:40PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
> correct the comparison parameter of MHz from 4,000,000 to 1,000,000

You're assuming this wasn't intentional.  As the division by 1000000
ends up losing the fractional rate, I decided to leave 1-4MHz as kHz,
so something like 1.832MHz would be displayed as 1832kHz and not
1MHz.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/