linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] clock: correct the comparison parameter of MHz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:08:06 +0800
From:	Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clock: correct the comparison parameter of MHz

Hi Russell King,

On 8/7/2013 16:02, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 03:47:40PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>> correct the comparison parameter of MHz from 4,000,000 to 1,000,000
>
> You're assuming this wasn't intentional.  As the division by 1000000
> ends up losing the fractional rate, I decided to leave 1-4MHz as kHz,
> so something like 1.832MHz would be displayed as 1832kHz and not
> 1MHz.

Thanks for clarification of this. Now, it is better for me to understand 
this piece of code.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/