[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5202336C.5020707@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:45:48 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 05/14] perf tools: tidy up sample parsing overflow
checking
On 07/08/13 11:54, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 11:19:32 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 07/08/13 11:09, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:26:25 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>>> The size of data retrieved from a sample event must be
>>>> validated to ensure it does not go past the end of the
>>>> event. That was being done sporadically and without
>>>> considering integer overflows.
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be great if the macro (or something) can do all three things
>>> together - checking overflow, getting current value (pointer) and
>>> advancing the array to the size? Is that possible?
>>
>> Macros are not the answer to everything.
>
> Right.
>
> But I was seeing repeating patterns of the three.. so I asked if there's
> a better alternative.
This patch fixes bugs. Changing the code layout is a separate patch. I am
not going to do that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists