[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130807155917.506c1f7b67002b3c6728d779@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 15:59:17 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree
Hi Sedat,
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:43:59 +0200 Sedat Dilek
<sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The refreshed patch is from 02-Aug-2013.
> So why did next-20130805 and next-20130806 did not have it?
> I was reading for these Linux-next releases the same: "I have used the
> ext4 tree from next-20130726 for today.".
> I am wondering what went wrong.
Ted did not update the branch of his tree that is included in linux-next
until now. Presumably he was doing some testing - there were other
changes in it as well.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists