[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375855849.2424.82.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 23:10:49 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, xi.wang@...il.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return
value 'result'
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> >> The right answer to the code is to config it out and then you don't have
> >> to worry about it one way or another.
[]
> > Hmm... do you mean you spend 5 minutes to get a conclusion ? if so,
> > better not use word 'seems' which is not a suitable word appeared in
> > the results, proofs or conclusions.
[]
> You are too bad in english to do kernel development. You don't seem to
> know how to communicate in english...
I don't think that's true.
For instance, pessimization is a pretty
obscure word. Most native English speakers
could probably guess what it meant, but I
couldn't hold any low opinion of non-native
speaker that asked "what does that mean".
The code communicates just fine.
Chen Gang could be a bit more careful when
making significant changes to core kernel
facilities.
(said the guy that broke just printk)
I think the fluent English speakers can be
tolerant reasonably well when the code is
correct and compelling (and correct).
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists