linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 35/35] cpufreq: tegra: use cpufreq_table_validate_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:44:29 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	rjw@...k.pl, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/35] cpufreq: tegra: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()

On 08/08/2013 07:48 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
> cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Assuming the new function simply does what the two removed lines do,
this looks fine to me.

>  static int tegra_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
> -	cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, freq_table);

This doesn't seem to be mentioned in the commit description. I assume
this is simply dead/useless code removal?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/