[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <001a01ce9505$59c28b20$0d47a160$%jun@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 22:35:45 +0900
From: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
To: 'Doug Anderson' <dianders@...omium.org>,
'Chris Ball' <cjb@...top.org>
Cc: 'Olof Johansson' <olof@...om.net>,
'Jaehoon Chung' <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
'James Hogan' <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
'Grant Grundler' <grundler@...omium.org>,
'Alim Akhtar' <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
'Abhilash Kesavan' <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
'Tomasz Figa' <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Always setup the bus after
suspend/resume
On Wed, August 07, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> After suspend/resume all of the dw_mmc registers are reset to
> defaults. We restore most of them, but specifically don't setup the
> clock registers after resume unless we've got a powered card. Things
> still work because the core will eventually call set_ios() and we'll
> set things up.
Hmm, I didn't get the need of this call during resume.
I think set_ios is only valid where core layer calls.
Besides, important things is ios's parameters.
If suspend has finished successfully, last call of set_ios() is from mmc_power_off().
On seeing fields of 'mmc->ios' stored last, these values aren't proper in resume phase.
Please check mmc_power_off() function.
In case MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER it could be kept.
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
>
> There doesn't seem to be any reason that I can see _not_ to set things
> up after resume. Restoring this state makes the code easier to reason
> about and should help prevent bugs. It also allows us to do a
> register dump before and after suspend/resume to confirm that we've
> set things up OK.
>
> I examined the state of the dw_mmc instance before and after suspend
> after this patch. I had no card inserted in an SD card slot.
>
> Before this patch, differences were:
> * CLKDIV (0x08)
> * CLKENA (0x10)
> * TMOUT (0x14)
> * CMD (0x2C) - difference is not important
> * CLKSEL (0x9C - exynos specific)
>
> After this patch, only TMOUT was different. I have a separate patch
> for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v4: None
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 13a363c..0fa3135 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -2522,9 +2522,7 @@ int dw_mci_resume(struct dw_mci *host)
> struct dw_mci_slot *slot = host->slot[i];
> if (!slot)
> continue;
> - if (slot->mmc->pm_flags & MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER) {
> - dw_mci_set_ios(slot->mmc, &slot->mmc->ios);
> - }
> + dw_mci_set_ios(slot->mmc, &slot->mmc->ios);
>
> ret = mmc_resume_host(host->slot[i]->mmc);
> if (ret < 0)
> --
> 1.8.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists