[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130812150945.GL27162@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:09:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Teach perf_trace_##call() to check
hlist_empty(perf_events)
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:08:26PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/05, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry... should I resend once again ?
> >
> > Sure, why not. It's only 3 patches :-)
>
> OK. Added "v2" to avoid the confusion.
>
> The only change is
>
> - Reviewed-and-Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> + Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> + Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> > I wonder if the Reviewed-by assumes the Acked-by?
>
> I dunno. But since you gave me both, I'd better preserve them all.
So I suppose the down-side to putting them in TP_ARGS() is that you
cannot use arbitrary expressions for them anymore; like:
TP_ARGS(foo);
TP_perf_assign(
__perf_task(foo->ponies);
__perf_count(foo->horses);
),
Not that we actually did something like that, but I imagine it might've
been useful.. A well, lets not worry too much about that and go with
this. We'll get creative again if we ever need something like that.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists