[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130812174515.GA14359@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:45:15 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Teach perf_trace_##call() to check
hlist_empty(perf_events)
On 08/12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> So I suppose the down-side to putting them in TP_ARGS() is that you
> cannot use arbitrary expressions for them anymore; like:
>
> TP_ARGS(foo);
>
> TP_perf_assign(
> __perf_task(foo->ponies);
> __perf_count(foo->horses);
> ),
>
> Not that we actually did something like that, but I imagine it might've
> been useful..
Yes. This is of course less generic. And more confusing, I agree.
> A well, lets not worry too much about that and go with
> this. We'll get creative again if we ever need something like that.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Thanks ;)
BTW. Can't we kill __perf_addr() and the corresponding argument in
perf_trace_buf_submit/perf_tp_event ?
Or do you think it can have a new user?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists