[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1DC40B07CD6EC041A66726C271A73AE61AA5EB4C@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:34:09 +0000
From: "Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the
wireless tree
> I think I have this slightly different in wireless-testing. Johannes, please
> review and advise...
> > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c between commit eabc4ac5d760
> > ("iwlwifi: pcie: disable L1 Active after pci_enable_device") from
> > thewireless tree and commit f2532b04b2ec ("iwlwifi: pcie: don't
> > disable
> > L1 for newest NICs") from the wireless-next tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (maybe - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> > (no action is required).
> > diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
> > index 390e2f0,e52d1ce..0000000
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
> > @@@ -1502,16 -1400,22 +1400,22 @@@ struct iwl_trans
> *iwl_trans_pcie_alloc(
> > spin_lock_init(&trans_pcie->reg_lock);
> > init_waitqueue_head(&trans_pcie->ucode_write_waitq);
> >
> > + if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
> > + err = -ENODEV;
> > + goto out_no_pci;
> > + }
> > +
> > - /* W/A - seems to solve weird behavior. We need to remove this if
> we
> > - * don't want to stay in L1 all the time. This wastes a lot of power */
> > - pci_disable_link_state(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S |
> PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 |
> > - PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM);
> > + if (!cfg->base_params->pcie_l1_allowed) {
> > + /*
> > + * W/A - seems to solve weird behavior. We need to remove
> this
> > + * if we don't want to stay in L1 all the time. This wastes a
> > + * lot of power.
> > + */
> > + pci_disable_link_state(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S |
> > + PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 |
> > + PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM);
> > + }
> >
> > - if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
> > - err = -ENODEV;
> > - goto out_no_pci;
> > - }
> > -
> > pci_set_master(pdev);
> >
> > err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(36));
This looks fine, and it seems to be exactly what you have in wireless-testing/master. I have yet another change pending to this which removes the err= in favour of taking it from pci_enable_device() though.
johannes
(sorry for the outlook mess - might want to use johannes@...solutions.net)
--
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists