linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65010: Use power efficient workqueue for power polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130812204328.GG6427@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:43:28 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65010: Use power efficient workqueue for power
 polling

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:57:54PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Right, I know checkpatch.pl will complain, but one must exercise some
> common sense in situations such at these. To bring down a single zero for
> the sake of the (in my opinion, slightly out of date) 80 char rule seems a
> little rigid.
> 
> If you feel strongly enough I'll keep your patch in tact however.

Please do.  Lots of people do continue to use 80 column editors and mail
clients and as you say the tooling complains.  It's one thing if it's
hard to find a place to break the line but that's really not the case
here.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)