lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:57:29 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
CC:	balbi@...com, rob.herring@...xeda.com, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, ian.campbell@...rix.com, rob@...dley.net,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, grant.likely@...aro.org,
	idos@...eaurora.org, mgautam@...eaurora.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] usb: dwc3: msm: Add device tree binding information

On 08/09/2013 03:53 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
> 
> MSM USB3.0 core wrapper consist of USB3.0 IP (SNPS)
> and HS, SS PHY's controll and configuration registers.

s/controll/control/

> It could operate in device mode (SS, HS, FS) and host
> mode (SS, HS, FS, LS).

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-ssusb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-ssusb.txt

> +MSM SuperSpeed DWC3 USB SoC controller
> +
> +Required properities :
> +- compatible : sould be "qcom,dwc3-hsphy";
...
> +Required properities :
> +- compatible : sould be "qcom,dwc3-ssphy";

I would expect different compatible values to be documented in different
files.

> +Optional properties :
> +- gdsc-supply : phandle to the globally distributed switch controller
> +  regulator node to the USB controller.

Which of the 3 compatible values that were described above is that
property optional for?

> +Sub nodes:
> +- Sub node for "DWC3 USB3 controller".
> +  This sub node is required property for device node. The properties
> +  of this subnode are specified in dwc3.txt.

Why not represent the PHY and USB controller as separate top-level
nodes? They can point at each-other with phandles if they need to know
each-others' identity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ