[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130814111837.9a692a77b35ba8cbb4a9149b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:18:37 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-current tree with Linus' tree
Hi Russell,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-current tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c between commit b88a2595b6d8 ("perf/arm: Fix
armpmu_map_hw_event()") from Linus' tree and commit d9f966357b14 ("ARM:
7810/1: perf: Fix array out of bounds access in armpmu_map_hw_event()")
from the arm-current tree.
These are the same patch except for the return code (and the much more
comprehensive commit message in the arm-current tree version). I fixed it up
(using the arm-current tree version - return -EINVAL instead of -ENOENT - I have
no way to guess which is right) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
action is required).
P.S. the version in Linus' tree has no Signed-off-by from the author.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists